Port Orford, OR STR Market Report 2026: $37,640 on 54 Listings

Port Orford's short-term rental market should be read on its own scale. The supported record shows about $37,640 in typical annual revenue across 54 active listings, a $315 average nightly rate, 43 percent occupancy, and $130 in revenue per available night. These numbers form one coherent town-level picture: a relatively small sample with a high nightly rate and occupancy below half of available nights.

The cleanest comparison discipline is also the most important. Pacific City reports $40,828 across 286 listings, more than five times Port Orford's listing sample, and its figures should never be substituted into a Port Orford purchase, appraisal, or management proposal. This report keeps the towns separate, follows Port Orford's August peak and February trough, and sends permit questions to Port Orford City Desk without guessing a phone number. This is not legal advice.

The Port Orford Baseline Is $37,640 Across 54 Listings

A typical year in the Port Orford sample produced about $37,640 across 54 active short-term rentals. That is the appropriate starting line for a town-level discussion, not a promise that every property will reach the same result. A buyer should preserve both parts of the label whenever quoting it: the revenue figure and the sample size. Removing the 54-listing context makes a small coastal market look more universal than the data supports.

The sample is useful precisely because it is local. It does not need a blended Oregon coast average to sound more substantial. For an owner reviewing a management proposal, the first question should be whether the cited market is Port Orford and whether the stated base is the 54 listings in this research. If a different town or listing stock count appears, the proposal has moved away from the supported benchmark.

ADR, Occupancy, and RevPAN Describe Different Parts of Performance

Port Orford's average nightly rate was $315, occupancy was 43 percent, and revenue per available night was $130. The three measures should be read together. ADR describes the average booked rate, occupancy describes the share of available nights booked, and RevPAN expresses revenue across available nights. None of them alone explains the complete annual result, and none guarantees the performance of a particular address.

The relationship between a $315 ADR and 43 percent occupancy is especially useful for underwriting discipline. A high booked rate does not mean the calendar is full, while occupancy below half does not erase the value of the nights that do book. A host should resist turning either metric into a slogan. The annual revenue and $130 RevPAN already capture the combined market outcome more honestly.

A 54-Listing Market Makes Local Detail Matter

Port Orford's 54-listing sample is small enough that local operating knowledge can matter significantly. The research points to hands-on hosts, ocean-view differences among streets, repeat guests, and Highway 101 traffic patterns as the kind of local detail that shapes decisions. Those observations should guide due diligence, not be converted into unsupported premiums. A buyer still needs to understand the specific property rather than assume the town average transfers automatically.

A small sample can also move when listing stock changes, so the listing count should stay attached to the year being discussed. This report does not guess a future supply path or claim that 54 will remain constant. It treats 54 as the supported current base and encourages owners to recheck later extracts rather than building a permanent forecast from one snapshot.

Pacific City Is a Larger, Separate Market

Pacific City's supported figure is $40,828 across 286 listings. It is a different Oregon coast market with more than five times as many active rentals in the cited sample. The revenue gap by itself is not permission to transfer assumptions from one place to the other. listing stock scale, guest behavior, and property mix remain town-specific, even when both markets appear under a broad coastal label.

A buyer comparing Port Orford and Pacific City should place the numbers on separate rows: Port Orford at $37,640 across 54 listings, and Pacific City at $40,828 across 286. This simple labeling protects appraisals and management proposals from a common error. A blended coastal average may look tidy, but it can hide which town actually supports the revenue figure being used.

August Is the Peak and February Is the Slow Month

August is Port Orford's peak month, with June and July also part of the strong summer stretch. February is the slow month. That seasonality gives hosts a broad calendar shape without supplying an exact nightly rate for any date. Pricing should recognize that summer and winter do not carry equal demand, while still responding to the property's own bookings rather than an guessed townwide weekly occupancy curve.

For underwriting, the peak-and-trough pattern is a reminder to test annual assumptions against uneven demand. A model that spreads $37,640 evenly across the year would erase the actual calendar shape. The supported conclusion is directional: August leads, February is slow, and summer is stronger. This research does not provide monthly revenue, so a responsible report stops before assigning unsupported dollar shares to those periods.

Portland Leads Guest Origins, Followed by Eugene

Portland is the largest origin market for Port Orford guests, followed by Eugene. Both cities support the picture of a drive-market destination whose calendar leans toward summer weekends and longer holiday opportunities. Public copy can acknowledge the practical value of a coastal stay for those guests, but it should still lead with Port Orford and the property's actual features rather than turning the listing into an advertisement for the departure city.

Origin data is most useful when it changes what the host proves. Guests committing to the drive should be able to understand the sleeping setup, parking, and property experience before arrival. The research does not support an exact trip length, lead time, or group composition for Port Orford, so those details should not be borrowed from another market. Portland first and Eugene second is the supported origin order.

Permits Must Be Confirmed With Port Orford City Desk

Current short-term rental requirements should be confirmed directly with Port Orford City Desk before a purchase or listing decision is final. This report does not supply a verified Port Orford City Desk phone number, so none should be guessed. The correct action is to contact the city through its current official channel and ask about the specific parcel, permit status, and requirements relevant at the time.

The permit check sits ahead of revenue enthusiasm. A $37,640 town average, $315 ADR, or $130 RevPAN cannot establish that one parcel may legally operate. A buyer who confirms financial assumptions but leaves jurisdiction unresolved has not completed underwriting. Poulsbo City Desk and its phone number belong to Washington and must not appear as the regulatory desk for this Oregon market.

What Buyers Should Carry Into Underwriting

A disciplined Port Orford model begins with the supported local record: $37,640 across 54 listings, $315 ADR, 43 percent occupancy, and $130 RevPAN. It then keeps August's peak, February's trough, Portland-led origins, and the property's permit status visible as separate considerations. The report does not establish expenses, financing terms, fees, or a property-specific forecast, so those inputs must come from other verified work.

The goal is not to turn a market average into an offer price. It is to prevent a buyer from starting with the wrong town, the wrong sample, or an unlabeled annual number. Port Orford's modest listing stock makes local property review particularly important. Market data can frame the questions, but the driveway, parcel, legal status, and operating plan determine whether the opportunity is real.

What Owners and Managers Should Carry Into the Listing

For an existing owner, the same figures can sharpen expectations without dictating a rate. The $315 ADR is a booked-night average across the sample, not an instruction to price every night identically. Forty-three percent occupancy is an annual market measure, not a target for a specific month. August and February require different treatment, and the live calendar should remain responsive to actual demand.

Managers should label every presentation with Port Orford and the 54-listing base. If a deck cites Pacific City's $40,828 or 286 listings, correct it before the number reaches an owner. Market reporting is part of trust: a locally accurate, modest claim is more useful than a larger borrowed figure. The same discipline should extend to permit language and guest-origin assumptions.

The listing itself should describe the Port Orford property rather than repeating the market report as sales copy. Guests need the real sleeping arrangement, parking, and on-site experience; they do not need a claim that the home's performance will mirror a town average. Keep revenue analysis in owner decisions and use the Portland-then-Eugene origin pattern only to improve clarity for the guests most likely to compare the stay.

How to Read the Annual Number Without Flattening the Calendar

The $37,640 figure represents a typical annual result in the supported Port Orford sample. It should not be divided into twelve equal monthly targets because the research explicitly identifies August as the peak and February as the trough. Equal monthly allocation would hide the most important seasonal fact available and create false precision where no monthly revenue table has been supplied.

A better review keeps the annual figure intact and marks the supported seasonal direction beside it. Owners can then compare actual property reservations with that broad shape without pretending the town record supplies missing monthly values. This preserves what the research knows, highlights what it does not know, and leaves room for a property's real calendar to provide the next layer of evidence.

The same rule applies to ADR and occupancy. Multiplying or reallocating the annual averages into guessed monthly values would produce a model that looks detailed but is not sourced. Use $315, 43 percent, and $130 as annual market measures. Any month-level assumption used in a purchase model should be identified as a separate input rather than attributed to this report.

A Clean Comparison Protects Every Later Decision

Once Pacific City and Port Orford are mixed, the error can spread from a research note into a listing presentation, appraisal discussion, owner expectation, and purchase model. Keeping $37,640 and 54 listings together at the first step prevents that chain. The comparison remains available, but it stays clearly labeled as two markets rather than one coastal benchmark.

This discipline also protects the guest-facing story. Portland and Eugene are the supported Port Orford origin markets, while August and February define the seasonal high and low. Borrowing another town's demand pattern would be just as misleading as borrowing its revenue. A locally coherent report keeps financial, seasonal, origin, and regulatory facts under the same Port Orford label.

The final decision still belongs at the parcel level. Confirm current permission with Port Orford City Desk, inspect the property's actual features, and identify every cost or financing input not supplied here. The market report can keep the starting evidence clean, but it cannot finish due diligence. That boundary is a strength because it prevents a town average from masquerading as a complete investment case.

Related Reading

More Port Orford, Oregon reading already live on Crest & Cove.

• Market a Port Orford Stay: Photograph Battle Rock by Name

• Port Orford STR Rules: Confirm Town Desk Before You List

• Port Orford Shoulder: August Peak, February Hole, Not Pacific City

• Port Orford Remote Stays: A 30-Night Minimum Is Not Occupancy

• DIY vs Hire in Port Orford: Independent Hosts Still Own This Desk

• Who Books a Port Orford Stay: Portland First, Then Eugene

• Buying a Port Orford Rental: Cite $37,640, Keep Pacific City Separate

• Port Orford Tourism Data: Battle Rock Is the Walk, Not Occupancy

• Complete Visitor's Guide to Port Orford on the Oregon Coast

• What It Costs to Start a Legal Port Orford STR Stay

• Financing a Port Orford Rental Without a Pacific City Year

• Port Orford vs Pacific City Desks: Use This Hall, Not the Neighbor

• Port Orford vs Pacific City: Two Towns, Keep Those Years Apart

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Port Orford's typical short-term rental revenue?

The supported market record is about $37,640 in typical annual revenue across 54 active listings. The sample size should stay attached whenever this figure is quoted, since Port Orford is a relatively small market, and it's a town-level reference rather than a guarantee for one address.

What are Port Orford's ADR, occupancy, and RevPAN?

The average nightly rate is $315, occupancy is 43 percent, and revenue per available night is $130. These metrics describe different parts of market performance and should be read together with the $37,640 annual revenue figure and 54-listing sample, not treated as a forecast for one specific property.

Can Pacific City data be used for Port Orford?

No. Pacific City reports $40,828 across 286 listings, while Port Orford reports $37,640 across 54. They're separate Oregon coast markets with very different sample sizes, and any appraisal or proposal that substitutes Pacific City's larger figure for Port Orford's should be corrected.

When does Port Orford short-term rental demand peak?

August is the peak month, with June and July also part of the strong summer stretch. The research supports that directional calendar pattern but doesn't provide monthly revenue or a weekly occupancy curve, so hosts can plan around stronger summer demand without guessing exact rate premiums.

What is Port Orford's slowest month?

February is the slow month in the Port Orford research, the clear trough relative to the August peak and the stronger summer period. That finding should guide broad seasonality planning, not an exact claim about how many nights will book or what discount a specific property needs.

Where do Port Orford guests travel from?

Portland is the largest origin market, followed by Eugene. That order supports positioning Port Orford as a drive-market coastal destination, especially around stronger summer weekends. The research doesn't provide exact stay lengths or booking lead times for this market, so those figures shouldn't be imported from another town.

Who confirms Port Orford short-term rental permit requirements?

Port Orford's own city desk should confirm current requirements for a specific parcel. Market revenue, ADR, occupancy, and RevPAN figures don't establish legal permission to operate, so a permit question always goes to the city directly rather than getting inferred from the market data.

How should a buyer underwrite a Port Orford property?

Start with the local, labeled record: $37,640 across 54 listings, $315 ADR, 43 percent occupancy, and $130 RevPAN. Keep August's peak and February's trough in view, but don't turn them into guessed monthly projections, and confirm parcel and permit status with the city desk before committing capital.

Work with Crest & Cove Creative

Port Orford underwriting breaks when Pacific City's larger market is passed off as local evidence. The defensible baseline is $37,640 across 54 listings, with every assumption kept on its own labeled line.

We help independent hosts and buyers turn Port Orford's actual market record into clear positioning and disciplined questions. Reach out at crestcove.co or (256) 998-7502. Send the live listing draft and the facts you can actually cite.

Reach out at crestcove.co or (256) 998-7502.